Friday, April 13, 2012

More Support for Maldon-Dombarton


Coverage in the Illawarra Mecury
2 April
31 March
21 March:
21 March
Quote: Port Kembla’s chances of becoming the state’s second container port servicing Sydney are slipping away because of delays in the approval of the Maldon-Dombarton rail line, Australia’s peak shipping group has said.
Shipping Australia chief executive Llew Russell said the longer it took for a decision to be made on the rail link, the more likely it was that Newcastle would win the race to become Sydney’s overflow port.
‘‘We think any delay in the completion of this railway is of concern,’’ Mr Russell said.
‘‘We would be worried with any undue delay.’’
His comments came a day after Prime Minister Julia Gillard identified the Maldon Dombarton rail project as one of the Federal Government’s major infrastructure initiatives.

Wollongong City Council Concerns re Trucks


At its meeting of 30 January, 2012 Wollongong City Council resolved as follows:
1. Wollongong City Council inform Transport for New South Wales of its concern about the increased use of road-based bulk haulage within the Wollongong Local Government Area, focussed on Port Kembla. Wollongong City Council requests a report from Transport for New South Wales on the environmental and social impact on the City of such planned increase.
2. A report be prepared on the impact of increased road-based bulk haulage on Council roads and infrastructure.
3. Wollongong City Council reaffirms its commitment to focus upon and support the upgrade of railway infrastructure for the movement of commodities and freight through Port Kembla, as per Council’s resolution of 27 September 2011, Minute No 147.
4. Council support the decision of the Federal Government in October 2011 to advance the Maldon-Dombarton link with a $24.5M commitment for works to make the project shovel-ready.
5. Councillors be given a briefing on any breaches of the truck curfew conditions.
6. Council officers be empowered to make submissions to any future developments in the region that add significantly more trucks onto Wollongong roads and such submissions express Council’s position for preference of freight haulage by rail (or ship).

7. Council urgently lodge a submission with IPART in its review of rail access pricing on the grain line network and to ask IPART to consider the impact of extra grain trucks on Mt Ousley and other Wollongong highways.

Wednesday, January 11, 2012

Warning of Traffic Chaos

Letter Illawarra Mercury 7 January 2012

Perhaps the local Northern Suburbs traffic chaos (Letters, 31/12/11 and 4/1/12) will help to keep Sydney - Wollongong traffic to the Mt Ousley Road rather than diverting to Bulli Pass/Princes Highway/Memorial drive.

BHP Billiton received a pre Christmas approval from the NSW Government for a big increase in its Appin complex coal production to 10.5 million tonnes per annum with continued road haulage. Unless BHP Billiton has a change of heart and opts to support and use the Maldon Dombarton rail link, most of this coal will be moved by a constant procession of trucks using the Appin and Mt Ousley Roads

The extra coal trucks will also share Mt Ousley and other roads with the extra grain trucks, also approved in December 2011 by the NSW Government, with the apparent support of Wollongong City Council. Plus the trucks carrying car imports and other freight, along with Wollongong /Shellharbour people driving to and from Sydney.

However, it is always possible that some of BHP Billiton's extra coal trucks could find their way down the Bulli Pass etc, thus adding to Northern Suburbs traffic chaos.

Wollongong needs much better balance between road and rail for the cartage by coal, grain, cement and new cars and heavy machinery to and from Port Kembla. If coal and other companies will not do the right thing on their own accord, it is up to government to effectively regulate.

Irene Tognetti

Spokesperson

Wollongong Transport Coalition

Keiraville

.

COMMENT The two applications and approvals for more grain trucks and more coal trucks (via BHP Billiton) on our crowded highways are as follows:

The proposed modification relates to the removal of operational restrictions that govern the receival of grain at the terminal by road transport. Graincorp Operations Limited is seeking to allow the receival of grain by road 24 hours a day, 7 days a week and to remove the restricted annual tonnage limit.

.

http://majorprojects.planning.nsw.gov.au/index.pl?action=view_job&job_id=4628

.

The Bulli Seam Project, which includes: augmenting, upgrading and using the existing infrastructure at the Appin and West Cliff coal mines; extracting up to 10.5 million tonnes of run-of-mine coal a year from the Bulli coal seam for a period of 30 years using longwall mining methods; processing run-of-mine coal at both the West Cliff and Dendrobium washeries; transporting product and run-of-mine coal from the site by road; disposing of coal rejects on site; and rehabilitating the site.

.

http://majorprojects.planning.nsw.gov.au/index.pl?action=view_job&job_id=2673

.

.

WOLLONGONG DESERVES BETTER

The Prime Minister's announcement on 19 October 2011 of $25.5 million to advance the completion of the Maldon Dombarton rail link needs to be matched by:

BHP Billiton taking a more responsible approach than doubling the amount of coal on public roads

AND The NSW Government putting in funds to expedite completion of the Maldon Dombarton Rail Link.



.

BHP RULES OUT USING MALDON-DOMBARTON LINE

BY BEN LANGFORD Illawarra Mercury

20 Oct, 2011 04:00 AM

The world's largest miner, BHP Billiton, would not use the Maldon-Dombarton rail line to transport coal from its Illawarra mines to the Port Kembla coal terminal.

It is a blow to the forecast demand for the proposed rail line, as BHP Billiton sends seven million tonnes of coal a year to Port Kembla for export.

The stance of BHP Billiton - and subsidiary Illawarra Coal - is revealed in consultant ACIL Tasman's feasibility study into the Maldon-Dombarton link.

The miner's submission said while it supported the rail link proposal, there was "no likelihood" it would use the line.

The feasibility study said that moving output from Illawarra Coal's Appin and West Cliff mines to the new rail line would save $21 million over 20 years in costs associated with road accidents, congestion, road degradation and pollution from road transport.

It said the two mines generated 70 per cent of the road freight considered "contestable" by the new line.

ACIL Tasman concluded new government measures may be needed to force coal onto the rails, such as making rail freight a condition of a mine's expansion.

In Wollongong on Tuesday, Prime Minister Julia Gillard announced $25.5 million to further progress the rail link, but stopped short of a full commitment to completing the project.

The feasibility study found there would be demand for more than 12 million tonnes a year of coal on the line, but it would come from mines near Lithgow rather than the Bulli seam operations.

"There is a strong local interest in reducing the number of trucks, or at least in reducing their growth, on the major arterial roads serving Port Kembla, and a view that a Maldon-Dombarton line would help do that," the study said.

"The evidence does not support this view. The owner of the colliery that is expected to provide the most significant growth of trucks, BHP, has stated that 'it is neither economically feasible nor environmentally sound to consider a rail connection to the Maldon to Dombarton rail link at this time'.

"To reduce truck numbers, other policies would be required such as restrictions on mining licences and changes to road user charges."

The main reason Illawarra Coal would not use the rail line was found to be the cost of new infrastructure to send its coal about 13km to meet the train.

"It is neither economically feasible nor environmentally sound to consider a rail connection to the Maldon-Dombarton rail link at this time," the miner's submission said.

Yesterday, Illawarra Coal head of external affairs John Brannon said the rail line would have benefits, but the company would not use it. !!!

"Illawarra Coal remains supportive of the Maldon-Dombarton rail link proposal but cannot make a commitment to the use of such a facility as Illawarra Coal's existing operations are geographically remote from the proposed alignment of the rail link," he said.

Xstrata's Tahmoor colliery is considered a more likely candidate to use the line.



.

WELCOME TO AN ELECTED COUNCIL

WTC extends congratulations to Cr Gordon Bradbery on his election as Lord Mayor, and all elected Councilors, following elections in September 2011.

Also in September 2011, Wollongong City Council called for an upgrade of the rail line between Wollongong and Sydney "to improve safety, reliability and speed of passenger and freight services."


.

Wednesday, September 28, 2011

Wollongong deserves better

The Federal government is still to release the feasibility study for the Maldon Dombarton rail link whilst the State Budget released 6 September could have done more for Wollongong rail and roads.

And now the State Government has given approval for more grain trucks this year.

Something for our newly elected Council to look at ?

The runaway truck on Wednesday 21 September 2011 on Mount Ousley follows three heavy truck accidents in the Illawarra Region, one fatal, one putting the Kiama Bomaderry line out of action and a bulk truck and trailer running off the Princes Highway at Albion Park Rail
See Illawarra Mercury:
http://newsstore.fairfax.com.au/apps/viewDocument.ac?page=1&sy=nstore&kw=Truck+smash+reignites+lower+speed+limit+call&pb=all_ffx&dt=selectRange&dr=1month&so=relevance&sf=text&sf=headline&rc=10&rm=200&sp=adv&clsPage=1&docID=ILL1109099A5IH6BBQU8

See Illawarra Mercury article on 20 September and Editorial for "Export boost puts pressure on our roads":
http://aap.newscentre.com.au/cpsunat/110921/library/private_&_public_partnerships/26711584.html

Letter Illawarra Mercury, p21, Friday September 9 2011

The report “Fatal Picton Rd Crash” (Mercury, August 27 and August 29) notes the sad loss of life following a collision between a car-carrying truck and a car on the Picton Road on Friday.

Whatever the cause of the fatal crash, the probability of it occurring had increased due to more trucks on the road.

So far this year, there have three extra generators of truck numbers on the Mt Ousley and in some cases Picton Road.
Firstly, it was caused by the failure of the NSW government to ensure compliance with a commitment by December 2010 to have 20 per cent of all car imports through Port Kembla moved from the port by rail.
Secondly, there has been a record number of heavy trucks moving grain to Port Kembla, with all indications that the long standing limit of 200,000 tonnes per year will be increased. An application to increase this limit is currently before the NSW Department of Planning. The environmental assessment and response to submissions does not even address the risk factors of increased fatal accidents.
Thirdly, quarry products moving from Bass Point to Glebe that used to go by coastal shipping are now going by heavy trucks.
All this on top very high levels of road haulage of coal on public roads.
Increased road crash risk is bad enough. Although no amount of money can replace a person, the federal government estimates the economic loss of a person killed in a road crash as approximately $2.4 million.
On top of increased road crash risk, additional numbers of heavy trucks bring extra noise and air pollution.
Wollongong Transport Coalition supports more use of rail and coastal shipping to move bulk products, and for the Federal and NSW governments to expedite completion of the Maldon-Dombarton link.

Irene Tognetti, Keiraville, spokesperson
for Wollongong Transport Coalition

Tuesday, August 16, 2011

EVEN MORE TRUCKS

On top of large numbers of coal trucks and a recent application for
more grain trucks on the Mt Ousley and other roads, the Part 3A Major
Projects Application
BASS POINT QUARRY PROJECT 08_0143
was on exhibition to Monday 25 July. It may be viewed at
http://majorprojects.planning.nsw.gov.au/index.pl?action=view_job&job_id=2707

It is the third application this year with the potential to put even
more big trucks on the Mt Ousley and other roads.
Did Wollongong City Council put in a submission ?
If not, why not?


.